|
CSS agrees with this but, together with the Chief Economic
Development Officers Society [CEDOS], is increasingly concerned
at the implications of the narrow focus on the ‘core’
cities and city regions as the currently favoured approach
to improving regional economic performance in this country.
We support the promotion of economic growth in our major cities
but we are concerned about the limitations of the push for
city regions on national and regional economic growth and
the potentially adverse impact especially on peripheral areas
that lie outside, within and between city regions.
CSS has joined forces with CEDOS to make an independent assessment
of sub-national economic development in this country including
city regions, polycentric regions and county regions. An interim
report ‘Making the most of our economic potential’
has already been published. This shows that whilst a city-region
approach may be appropriate in some areas, it is not the way
forward for many parts of the country. Indeed, there is evidence
that county regions, operating as large economies with a clear
geographical focus and sense of identity, can be at least
as significant as cities in driving economic growth.
CSS and CEDOS believe that, especially in the post-industrial
society, an over emphasis on city regions is one dimensional
and over-simplistic. To be successful, the Government must
recognize that all areas - cities, towns, counties and rural
areas - have important roles to play; and take a balanced
approach to sub-national economic policy and investment. |